Technology | Application | Advantages | Disadvantages | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
SOS Chromotest | Bacterial colorimetric assay indicating DNA damage or genotoxicity and easily adapted for HTS | Simplicity, high sensitivity, faster results compared to Ames test | Limited applicability to certain types of genotoxic agents | [26] |
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) | Genome-wide mutation analysis, DNA damage detection | High sensitivity, comprehensive coverage | Difficulty detecting low-abundant somatic mutations, high cost, complex data analysis | |
Microarrays | Gene expression profiling, DNA damage response pathways | High throughput, multiplexed analysis | Limited to pre-defined gene sets | |
Quantitative HTS | Screening compounds for genotoxicity and concentration-response profiling | Rapid testing of thousands of compounds, reduced false negatives, and cost-effectiveness | Requires robust informatics for data analysis; variability in potency estimates across profiles | [32] |
Omics Technologies (Genomics, Transcriptomics, Proteomics) | Comprehensive study of genetic material and cellular responses | Enables holistic understanding of toxicity mechanisms; rapid genome sequencing | Complexity in data interpretation; requires integration across multiple datasets | [3] |
Flow Cytometry | Cell cycle analysis, DNA damage detection | Rapid, quantitative analysis | Requires specific staining and instrumentation | |
Mass Spectrometry | Protein analysis, metabolite profiling, SNP genotyping, epigenotype analysis, and allele quantification | High sensitivity, specificity | Complex sample preparation, specialized instrumentation | |
Imaging | Cellular morphology, DNA damage visualization | Visual confirmation, high-content analysis | Requires image analysis software, potential for subjective interpretation | |
High-throughput computational models | Predictive modeling, data integration | Rapid analysis, identification of potential hazards | Model accuracy depends on data quality and model complexity |